Full Federal Court affirms Settlement CFOs – are solicitors’ CFOs next?

In a landmark decision for the Australian class action regime, the Full Court of the Federal Court has ruled that the Court has the power to make a so-called “common fund order” (CFO) at the settlement stage of proceedings.

Elliott-Carde v McDonald’s Australia Limited [2023] FCAFC 162 (McDonalds) will be welcomed by commercial litigation funders, given the spectre of uncertainty over settlement CFOs since the High Court’s 2019 decision in Brewster.[1] This uncertainty has now been put to rest, subject to any appeal.

The decision will also pique the interest of plaintiff class action firms. It provides further judicial support for the idea that the Court’s power extends to making a so-called “solicitors’ CFO”, being an order that the lead plaintiff’s solicitors receive a portion of any settlement proceeds in return for taking on the financial risks of the action. Akin to awarding a contingency fee, such an order would be novel in the Federal Court, and its availability could have far-reaching consequences for the conduct of class actions generally.
The Full Court’s decision
In a unanimous decision, the Full Court ruled that the court has power under section 33V(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (Act) to make a settlement CFO.
According to Justice Beach, the text, context and purpose of section 33V(2) do not preclude the making of a settlement CFO. The section confers a wide judicial discretion, which is not to be read down by reference to limitations not found in the language of the section. His Honour noted that settlement CFOs are conducive to the objectives of the class action regime, because litigation funding is a means by which claims which would not otherwise have been able to be brought are litigated.

Justice Lee (with whom Justice Colvin substantially agreed) expressed similar views.

In doing so, all three judges ringfenced the High Court’s decision in Brewster. That decision, they found, dealt only with section 33ZF(1) of the Act in the context of CFOs made at the start of a proceeding. It did not deal with any settlement approval or other exercise of power under section 33V. And, unlike section 33ZF(1), section 33V(2) is not a “gap-filling” power, but is a specific power to make orders as to the distribution of claim proceeds arising from a settlement.

The Full Court’s ruling will likely come as a surprise to very few. It was only in 2020 that the same court, in another class action, expressed the view that Brewster was no bar to the court’s power to make a CFO at the settlement stage.[2] And the ensuing three years saw a clear trend in the Federal Court making settlement CFOs.

However, the decision may still have a profound impact on the class action landscape in Australia. For instance, we may see:

  • A marked decrease in the number of class actions commenced on a “closed” basis, and a corresponding increase in “open” class filings. Particularly since Brewster, litigation funders have preferred closed classes. This is so that their financial investment was protected and there were no “free riders” among group members. The availability of settlement CFOs will significantly reduce the investment risk of open class actions and encourage funders to fund actions on an open basis.
  • A continuation of the high number of competing class actions. Historically, it was necessary for litigation funders to ensure that a sufficient “book” of loss had been “built”, so that the likely commission justified the expense and risk of the litigation. This necessity acted as a natural brake on competing actions. But CFOs remove the need to book build prior to commencing proceedings. In reducing the barriers to entry for lead plaintiffs and making litigation funders’ investments less risky, CFOs may encourage the filing of more competing actions.
  • A reversal of the recent trend of Victoria as class action plaintiffs’ forum of choice. Shortly following the Brewster decision was the introduction of the “Group Costs Order” (GCO) regime for class actions in the Supreme Court of Victoria. This regime permits solicitors for lead plaintiffs to receive a percentage of the monetary compensation recovered on behalf of class members. According to Professor Vince Morabito, filings data in the post-GCO period clearly shows a growth in the volume of class action litigation with respect to Victoria, and a significant decrease in Federal class actions.[3] Faced with strong competition from large plaintiff law firms prepared to carry financial risk in return for (what are effectively) contingency fees, litigation funders may revert to the Federal Court as their preferred forum, particularly for securities class actions. This outcome seems all the more plausible in the light of some of the starkly-low GCO rates approved by the Supreme Court of Victoria.  

In its December 2018 report (ALRC Report), the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended that the Act be amended to provide the Court with an express statutory power to make CFOs. It remains to be seen where the federal government sits in relation to this recommendation, particularly in the light of the Full Court’s decision in McDonalds.

Are solicitors’ CFOs next?
The McDonalds decision solely concerns the Court’s power to make a CFO in favour of a commercial litigation funder at the settlement stage of a class action. It is not a binding authority beyond that context.

However, the separate judgments of Justices Beach and Lee suggest that the Court’s power may extend to settlement CFOs in favour of not just commercial litigation funders, but of solicitors as well. Justice Lee stated at paragraph 380 of the judgment:

     … the distribution of monies paid under a settlement to a third-party to a class action who has acted in such a way to facilitate the realisation of the fund, and to whom a payment is “just” by reference to all the circumstances, need not necessarily be a commercial funder. … [O]ne can readily conceive of circumstances where it could be a “just” order to pay to a solicitor (who has taken the necessary risks to get in the settlement fund) a sum in addition to legal costs payable pursuant to a retainer.

  These remarks are not the first occasion that the Court has left open the concept of solicitors’ CFOs. In Klemweb Nominees Pty Ltd (as trustee for the Klemweb Superannuation Fund) v BHP Group Limited,[4] Justices Middleton, Beach and Lee suggested that the Court may have the power to make such orders in appropriate circumstances.

Nor are they the last occasion. In a judgment delivered on the same day as McDonalds, concerning a carriage dispute where one of the proposed funding models included a solicitors’ CFO, Lee J stated:

    … there is no substance in the argument that Pt IVA precludes, as a matter of power, the possibility of a settlement CFO which incorporates the payment of a fee to solicitors in an appropriate case. The same considerations apply mutatis mutandis to a CFO being sought upon a judgment obtained because solicitors ran the risk of funding the claim or claims that merged in the judgment.[5]

So, it certainly seems that judicial momentum is building for the recognition of power to make solicitors’ CFOs. However, it must be borne in mind that the favourable statements in the above decisions were only made in passing, so the question of power remains unresolved and seems ripe for consideration at appellate level.

Solicitors’ CFOs would, of course, effectively involve the payment of a contingency fee to the solicitors for lead plaintiffs. It was a recommendation in the ALRC Report that the Act be amended to permit the charging of contingency fees in Federal class actions. But, as with an express power for CFOs, it remains unclear what the federal government’s position is on this recommendation. Only time will tell.

Written by –  Alexander Sloan – Senior Associate, GRT Lawyers

[1] BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45.

[2] Davaria Pty Ltd v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 183.

[3] Morabito, Empirical perspectives on twenty-one years of funded class actions in Australia (April 2023), p 11.

[4] [2019] FCAFC 107 at [16]-[23] (Middleton and Beach JJ), [139]-[141] (Lee J).

[5] Greentree v Jaguar Land Rover Australia Pty Ltd (Carriage Application) [2023] FCA 1209 at [45].


More Posts

GRT Alert: A Milestone in GRT’s Global Expansion

We are delighted to announce the launch of GRT Lawyer’s International Projects Division.  This GRT corporate development not only aligns seamlessly with GRT’s Corporate Business Plan, but also signifies another monumental stride forward for our organization, both nationally and internationally. The Head of GRT Lawyer’s International Projects Division is Amarzaya Gantumur. With a remarkable legal background spanning

GRT Alert – ASX Compliance Update

Effective 5 February 2024, ASX has changed the procedures for entities applying for admission to the official list as an ASX-listed Company.In summary, the changes relate to: Spread RequirementsListing Rule 1.1 condition 8 provides that: Poor quality information about spread can delay or prevent a listing from proceeding. Therefore, ASX has developed a spread register

GRT Alert – ASX Corporate Governance Council Update

The ASX Corporate Governance Council has recently released a package of consultation materials for a proposed fifth edition of its Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations. Since its inception, the document aspires to represent a leading standard on corporate governance, and addresses important issues such as corporate conduct, culture, diversity, risk management, reporting, and remuneration. The

GRT Alert -Arado Sale – Announcement

GRT Lawyers has advised Canopy Tools Group Pty Ltd, CT4 Pty Ltd, and NewBase Computer Services Pty Ltd on the sale of their Arado cloud and managed services business to security and cloud service specialist Sovereign Cloud Holdings Limited, which trades as AUCloud (ASX:SOV) for a total purchase price of $7 million, comprising $3.325 million

Send Us A Message

Proudly Designed and Developed By
Morelly ® Business Optimisation

© 2023 GRT Lawyers
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. All rights reserved.

Office Assistant

Lilly Monaghan

Lilly became part of the GRT Lawyers team in October 2022, stepping into the role of Office Assistant. With a wealth of professional experience spanning more than ten years, Lilly has actively contributed in various administrative capacities.

This diverse background equips her with extensive expertise within the realm of administration, strengthening our team and the support provided to GRT Lawyers and the GRT Foundation.

Admin Coordinator

Amelia Milsop

Amelia is a highly skilled professional with seven years of experience working in administrative, and executive support roles. Her diverse skill set includes expertise in administration support, office operations, events management, and marketing. 

As an administrator, Amelia plays a vital role in overseeing day-to-day operations, administration support, streamlining processes, and maintaining efficient workflows. With her extensive experience, diverse skill set, and passion, Amelia brings a unique perspective and a well-rounded approach to her administrative work.

Finance Manager

Chan Hu

Full bio coming soon!


Dale Copley

Dale began working with GRT Lawyers at the start of 2023 after beginning his legal career with  top-tier firm. He recently retired from professional sports and is relatively new to the legal field, having been admitted in November of 2022.

Dale values the importance of teamwork and advising clients to assist them in achieving their business goals. His experience as a professional athlete has instilled in him the significance of collective efforts and strategic collaboration – qualities that now define his approach to his career in law.

He has a strong interest in equity markets and is acquiring valuable experience by advising on capital raises and various ASX listing rule concerns.


Rebecca Wei

As an accomplished associate corporate lawyer, Rebecca contributes a fresh perspective and a robust work ethic to our legal team. She has swiftly gained experience in corporate law, demonstrating dedication to assisting clients with their legal needs in an ever-evolving business landscape.

Rebecca specialises in capital market transactional matters, contract drafting, and corporate governance. She has supported senior lawyers in advising a diverse range of clients, including established corporations, startups, and entrepreneurs.

Senior Corporate Advisor

Alana Nisbet

Alana has over 10 years’ experience practicing predominantly in international top tier firms in Australia, London and Guernsey. Her primary practice areas are public and private mergers and acquisitions, equity capital markets and investment funds and she has significant experience advising on complex corporate transactions.

Alana is valued for her exemplary client service and have been ranked as a “Rising Star” for Equity Capital Markets and Mergers & Acquisitions by Legal 500.

Senior Associate

Amarzaya Gantumur

Amarzaya is the Head of GRT Lawyer’s International Projects Division.

She has over 14 years of experience in the global legal industry in both civil and common law jurisdictions. She has acted as counsel in numerous complex corporate and commercial transactions, and litigation matters, including cross border litigation and international commercial arbitration.

As a common law trained lawyer with working experiences in both civil law and common law jurisdictions, Amarzaya is particularly dedicated to international work due to her international clients and her global network. 

Her recent work experience includes representing a Mongolian state-owned entity in an international commercial arbitration (under SIAC rules); representing an Australian/Philippines entity in an international commercial arbitration (under SIAC rules); providing wide range of legal and technical support to a global mining services company in its operation in Mongolia; providing legal and technical support to a Mongolian financial institute in its operation in Australia.   

Amarzaya graduated from the School of Law, National University of Mongolia in 2004 and holds an LLM (Corporate and Finance Law) from the University of Hong Kong. She is fluent in both English and Mongolian. She was appointed as an arbitrator with the Mongolian International Arbitration Centre in 2022. She is a member of various other professional organizations, including the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb).

Senior Associate

Rachel Hendrie

Rachel is a commercial dispute resolution lawyer who has experience in litigating significant commercial, construction and financial services disputes and in international arbitration. She is experienced with managing document heavy litigation.

Her experience includes assisting major Australian banks in civil penalty proceedings initiated by AUSTRAC in the Federal Court of Australia concerning AML/CTF compliance and fraud investigations, assisting financial services clients with responding to ACCC and ASIC notices including corporate shareholder and contractual disputes for oil and gas clients in Supreme Courts.

Rachel has worked for global top-tier law firms in both Brisbane and Melbourne.

Senior Associate

Alexander Sloan

Alex is a commercial litigator with experience in funded litigation and class actions. He has acted for publicly listed companies (both ASX and SGX), large private companies, litigation funders, SMEs, and company directors in a range of commercial disputes.

His experience includes complex, cross-border financial services litigation, class actions, product liability, insolvencies, and corporate disputes.

Alex has prosecuted and defended claims in the Supreme Courts of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and the ACT, and in the Federal Court of Australia. He also acted in the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.

Alex was admitted to practice as a solicitor in 2015 and worked for several years in a national Australian law firm, prior to joining GRT Lawyers in 2021.

General Manager

Aylesha James-Pearson

m 0433 555 812


  • Business Operations
  • People and Culture
  • Human Resources
  • Marketing
  • Event Coordination
  • Project Management


Aylesha serves as the General Manager at GRT Lawyers, providing effective leadership and overseeing the day-to-day operations of the firm. In her role, she manages human resources, marketing, events, and directly supervises the Administration team.

Bringing more than 19 years of experience in office management, senior administration, project and event management, as well as human resources, Aylesha has a proven track record of excellence in high-pressure environments. Her wealth of experience and professionalism ensures the seamless functioning of the firm. Aylesha excels in optimizing operational efficiencies by reviewing and implementing systems, policies, and procedures to support business functions, resulting in impactful results. She adopts a holistic approach, balancing a keen eye for detail with a focus on overarching goals.

Aylesha’s passion lies in people and culture, where she actively fosters strong relationships across all levels of the business. She connects with staff to instill the core values of GRT Lawyers and the GRT Foundation, believing in creating value through people. Her approach involves working with passion and understanding, offering support and cultivating relationships that enhance both business and individual performance.


Her career history encompasses multi-faceted roles giving her exposure to the specialty fields of Human Resources, Marketing and Event Management. Roles have included:

  • Human resources, including recruitment, performance management, staffing, new employee onboarding, employee benefits, payroll and training and development.
  • Marketing – including roles involving the development and implementation of marketing and business development strategies.
  • Background in planning internal and external events from conception through to execution, displaying qualities of a successful event planner: thorough yet precise, expert knowledge, ingenuity in identifying and solving problems and clear, concise communication.

“There’s always another level up. There’s always another ascension. More grace, more light, more generosity, more compassion, more to shed, more to grow.” -Elizabeth Gilbert


Ashley Hill

m 0415 150 866


  • Commercial litigation
  • International commercial arbitration
  • Energy – oil, gas, coal, and electricity
  • Product liability – recalls and litigation
  • Resources – water and agribusiness
  • Financial services
  • Insurance – including D&O, PI and BI
  • Regulatory – securities and governance; anti-bribery and anti-corruption
  • Hotel development and management disputes
  • IT industry disputes
  • IP claims including counterfeiting, passing-off, copyright infringement
  • Mediation, Adjudication and Advocacy


Ashley has in excess of 23 years’ experience as a litigator and disputes lawyer. In his time at GRT Lawyers and working for top-tier Australian and global law firms (in the Middle-East and Singapore), Ashley has acted for clients across multiple continents on complex commercial litigation and international arbitration.


Ashley’s current practice includes investment protection and dispute matters across a number of industry sectors including energy and resources, financial services, technology, agribusiness, tourism, in addition to contentious regulatory, insurance disputes and product liability matters.

The international scope of Ashley’s work has given him a valuable insight into cross-border disputes in common law and civil law jurisdictions. He has practical experience with most of the world’s renowned international commercial arbitration institutions including ICC, LCIA, SIAC, SCC and ICDR/AAA.

Since 2014, Ashley has been listed in ‘Best Lawyers in Australia’ Peer Review for the categories of International Arbitration, Litigation, Insurance and Product Liability.  In 2019, Ashley was added to the Doyle’s Guide Leading Commercial Litigation and Dispute Resolution Lawyers in Queensland.


Ashley holds Bachelor Degrees in Law and Arts (University of New England) and he is:

  • a member of the Queensland Law Society (QLS)
  • Executive Council Member of Asia-Pacific Forum for International Arbitration (AFIA)
  • Associate Member of Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA); and
  • ordinary member of Australian Insurance Law Association (AILA)

Scott Standen

m 0447 790 009


  • In depth understanding of the M&A processes (public M&A and private M&A transactions)
  • Public equity capital markets transactions
  • Management of due diligence processes
  • Deep understanding of governance frameworks
  • Corporate structuring
  • Capital structure management
  • Transaction management

Scott is a founder and Director of GRT Lawyers and GRT Foundation and corporate lawyer. He leads a team of specialist legal professionals, providing advice to organisations of all sizes, from middle market, large corporates and government owned corporations.

Scott’s career spans more than 20 years as a corporate lawyer and has encompassed an in-house general counsel role, director of Statutory Authorities and corporate legal adviser to managing directors, chief financial officers and boards of directors of ASX listed companies.

Scott is regularly called on by clients to provide strategic corporate advice to boards of directors and to project manage merger and acquisition transactions and public equity markets transactions. He prides himself in providing technically accurate and commercially focused corporate advice for public, private and listed companies, boards of directors and corporate advisers.

In particular, Scott advises on public equity markets transactions, debt issuances and restructuring, corporate governance and advisory, regulatory compliance, public and private M&A transactions, contract negotiation and directors’ duties and liabilities.


Scott’s experience includes:

  • Advising Cerro Resources Limited in relation to its public market merger and acquisition deal with Canadian based Primero Gold Limited and the concurrent spin out of assets to Santana Metals Limited and listing of Santana Metals Limited on ASX
  • Advising Discovery Metals Limited in relation to its A$250 million debt restructuring and associated equity raisings and proposed convertible note issue
  • Advising Polymetals Limited in relation to its acquisition by Southern Cross Goldfields by way of scheme of arrangement
  • Advising Southern Cross Goldfields Limited in relation to its A$60 million capital raising transaction involving equity, debt and hybrid securities
  • Dual listing on Hong Kong Exchange of ASX listed company
  • ASX listing of Asia focused technology / media company and
  • ASX listing of Apiam Animal Health Limited, vertically integrated provider of services and product to agricultural industry and
  • ASX listing of P2P Transport Limited.


Scott holds Bachelor Degrees in Law and Business Administration and a Masters of Law. Scott has previously held positions as a Director on the Boards of the Queensland Manufactured Water Authority (and related entities) and the Queensland Bulk Water Authority (and related entities).

Managing Director

Glenn Vassallo

0422 857 760


  • Public capital markets
  • Corporate law
  • Private capital markets
  • Corporate advisory
  • Corporate structuring
  • Complex corporate disputes
  • Social entrepreneurship


Glenn is a founder of GRT Lawyers and the GRT Foundation. As the Managing Director of GRT Lawyers and chair of the GRT Foundation, Glenn is passionate about working with his highly sophisticated national and international clients to implement their corporate strategy and solve their complex problems.

Glenn is passionate about implementing the corporate strategy of GRT Lawyers and the GRT Foundation. Glenn’s significant experience in formulating and executing complex corporate transactions (including IPOs, takeovers, and other equity capital market transactions) with a particular focus on national and international stock and security exchanges puts him in a unique position to provide excellent advice.


After building GRT Lawyers into a high-quality law firm, and together with his wife Eliza, establishing the GRT Foundation into a sustainable Australian charity, Glenn built GRT App (a subsidiary of GRT Lawyers) and sold that to an ASX listed company. Glenn was the first chairperson of any Australian ASX listed company to successfully chair a real-time virtual meeting of shareholders. He is still today, the only person who has chaired a real-time virtual shareholders meeting for an ASX listed company.

Glenn is often invited to speak on global topics such as capital markets, initial public offerings, takeovers and more recently was invited to New York University to speak at its global conference about social entrepreneurship.


Glenn holds a Bachelor Degree of Law (LLB) and a Bachelor Degree of Commerce. He has been a long-standing member of the Law Council of Australia Company Law Committee and the Queensland Law Society Company Law Committee, member of the Australian India Business Council (Energy and Resources – Subcommittee) and has significant ASX listed board experience.